Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Surviving a Roller Coaster Stock Market
There have been a number of research papers proving that investors, as a whole, experience far lower returns than the stock market itself as a result of frequent trading. It's not difficult to see why: Men and women, with no training in finance, attempting to manage their own 401k, Roth IRA, or Traditional IRA, or retirement accounts, panic when faced with volatility. After building up an investment portfolio over decades of work, a drop in stock prices of only ten or twenty percent can lead to tens, or even hundreds, of thousands of dollars in paper losses.
For an experienced investor with little or no debt, such a drop would be a non-event. They would know why they own the companies they hold, have estimated the future profitability, and calculated that into a discounted cash flow formula that gives them a rough idea of what their rate of return should be provided the variables they plugged in are accurate or conservatively projected. In fact, these investors (what have been called "true" investors) would welcome price drops, even if it meant half of their net worth disappeared from their monthly statements. I can tell you with absolute certainty that, all else being equal, if Berkshire Hathaway were to fall from $120,000 per share to $50,000 per share compared to its $72,000 per share book value, I would not for a moment lament the paper loss in my net worth, but rather back up the truck and attempt to buy as many shares as possible, even selling off other assets to fund the acquisition. There's a good chance the folks at my office would have to stop me from doing cartwheels. That's because I know the company, how it generates its cash, and have a rough approximation, adjusted on a rolling basis, of its intrinsic value.
In this article, I'm going to attempt to lay an intellectual foundation to help you think differently about stock market volatility, as well as provide you with some tips and tricks that might help traversing the stormy seas of Wall Street a whole lot easier.
Lay the Foundation
First, and please correct me if I'm wrong here, but you probably want to retire comfortably. You work hard, and want to be rewarded for that work; because of that, I want you to bookmark your page right here and take a moment to lay the foundation of what we're going to discuss by reading How to Think About Stock Prices, Price is Paramount, and Defensive Investing: Building a Portfolio for Volatile Markets. These three pieces of content will arm you with some background that allows me to go further in this discussion, making it easier to serve you better.
It's All About the History Books
Bill Gross, arguably the greatest pure bond investor alive today, has said that if he were only able to study one book, it would be a comprehensive history of the financial markets. That's because it can provide a framework for understanding financial psychology. Most people make the mistake of thinking that investing success is related to intelligence. I want you to repeat after me: Being a successful investor isn't about intelligence. Isaac Newton, one of the most brilliant minds the human race has ever produced, was wiped out in the Dutch Tulip Bubble.
A good place to start is the Ibbotson & Associates Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation Classic Yearbook. Although it costs around $100 per hard bound copy, it provides data about market levels and returns for more than a century. A quick glance, and you'll be comforted to see that over periods of ten years or longer, the stock market almost always performs well, especially when coupled with a dollar cost averaging plan that allows you to take advantage of low prices and fat dividend yields.
Some Checkpoints to Lower Your Risk
If you are worried about risk management and not necessarily generating maximum returns (which most likely describes 99% of the readers), here are some things to consider:
· The price-to-earnings ratio of your portfolio is no more than 10% higher than the market as a whole.
· The price-to-earnings ratio of your portfolio is no higher than twenty.
· You have a diversified base of stocks and bonds appropriate for your distance from
retirement (you should own more and more fixed income or cash equivalents as you approach the end of your working career).
· Focus on mutual funds with low expense ratios, good historical performance ratings and established management who invest in the funds they manage.
· If you are interested in long-term (five years or more) returns that are competitive, stop moving assets around in your retirement account. You don't know more than the market, and you aren't experienced enough to make rational judgment calls. Stick to your plan, continue your contributions, and wait until retirement. Unless there is a fundamental deterioration in the underlying asset, the stupidest time to sell anything is after it has fallen in price.
Get Competent Professional Advice
If you don't know what to do or feel completely lost, seek out a competent, well respected, and conservative financial adviser or planner. You want someone who has a good record and can explain, in one short paragraph, the rational for each investment held in your portfolio. You want someone who values your needs and listens to you; what good is it to have someone managing the money for which you work so hard if they don't understand what it is you are trying to accomplish?
Friday, November 14, 2008
Why It Might Be a Horrible Mistake to Sell Out During a Down Market
f you are more than five years away from retirement, your 401(k) was invested in a broadly diversified, low-cost index fund, and you’ve sold off your assets as the market has collapsed, you have made a very, very stupid long-term decision. Believe me, I wish it could be sugar coated, but you’ve effectively just dumped your ownership of great American businesses such as Johnson & Johnson, Coca-Cola, Wal-Mart Stores, and General Electric to value investors at a fraction of their intrinsic value. After years of diligently building your wealth, you’ve turned them over to hedge fund managers, well-heeled executives, and disciplined personal investors that have the emotional strength to ignore volatility and instead do what makes sense five or ten years from now.
The worst part: You sold because other people were selling their stocks (many of them involuntarily due to margin calls). It’s the grown up version of the classic question posed by nearly every mother in history – if your friends jumped off a bridge, would you? Do you really think that Pepsi is going to sell less soft drinks and potato chips over the next twenty years because of a recession? Sure, as Warren Buffett has said, short-term profits are going to get hit at nearly all companies throughout the economy. The long-term health of the United States should continue to trend upward given our social, economic, and legal structures. Just as stocks have been the greatest source of wealth since the market meltdown in 1973 and 1974, they should continue to be the best vehicle for long-term over the next thirty years.
Instead, for those of you who have time to wait out the volatility, it might be a good idea to consider drastically increasing your retirement contributions while the market is falling. Of course, this is only a possibility if you’ve been following all the rules that are constantly espoused by financial advisors such as Suze Orman by establishing an emergency fund, staying out of credit card debt, owning your home, and living well within your means. Otherwise, you simply won’t be able to afford to take advantage of the current prices. (This, it should be noted, is one of the reasons by the rich get richer – when things go south, they can pick up assets on the cheap.)
Monday, November 3, 2008
How do I actually make money from a stock?
It's Simple, Really
When you buy a share of stock, you are buying a piece of a company. Imagine that Harrison Fudge Company, a fictional business, has sales of $10,000,000 and net income of $1,000,000. To raise money for expansion, the company’s founders approached a Wall Street underwriting firm (an investment banker) and had them sell stock to the public. They might have said, “Okay, we don’t think your growth rate is great so we are going to price this so that future investors will earn 9% on their investment plus whatever growth you generate … that works out to around $11,000,000+ value for the whole company ($11 million divided by $1 million net income = 9% return on initial investment.)” Now, we’re going to assume that the founders sold out completely instead of issuing stock to the public
The underwriters may say, “You know, we want the stock to sell for $25 per share because that seems affordable so we are going to cut the company into 440,000 pieces, or shares of stock (440,000 shares x $25 = $11,000,000.) That means that each “piece” or share of stock is entitled to $2.72 of the profit ($1,000,000 profit ÷ 440,000 shares outstanding = $2.72 per share.) This figure is known as Basic EPS (short for earnings per share.) In other words, when you buy a share of Harrison Fudge Company, you are buying the right to your pro-rata profits. Were you to acquire 100 shares for $2,500, you would be buying $272 in annual profit plus whatever future growth (or losses) the company generated. If you thought that a new management could cause fudge sales to explode so that your pro-rata profits would be 5x higher in a few years, then this would be an extremely attractive investment.
What Makes It a Bit More Complicated
What muddies up the situation is that you don’t actually see that $2.72 in profit that belongs to you. Instead, management and the Board of Directors have a few options available to them, which will to a large degree determine the success of your holdings:
1. It can send you a cash dividend for some portion or the entirety of your profit. This is one way to “return capital to shareholders.” You could either use this cash to buy more shares or go spend it any way you see fit.
2. It can repurchase shares on the open market and destroy them. For a great explanation of how this can make you very, very rich in the long-run, read Stock Buy Backs: The Golden Egg of Shareholder Value.
3. It can reinvest the funds into future growth by building more factories, stores, hiring more employees, increasing advertising, or any number of additional capital expenditures that are
expected to increase profits. Sometimes, this may include seeking out acquisitions and mergers.
4. It can strengthen the balance sheet by reducing debt or building up liquid assets.
Which way is best for you? That depends entirely upon the rate of return management can earn by reinvesting your money. If you have a phenomenal business – think Microsoft or Wal-Mart in the early days when they were both a tiny fraction of their current size, paying out any cash dividend is likely to be a mistake because those funds could be reinvested at a high rate. There were actually times during the first decade after Wal-Mart went public that it earned more than 60% on shareholder equity. That’s unbelievable. (Check out the DuPont desegregation of ROE for a simple way to understand what this means.) Those kinds of returns typically only exist in fairy tales yet, under the direction of Sam Walton, the Bentonville-based retailer was able to pull it off and make a lot of associates and stockholders rich in the process.
